|
| TARGET LOCALIZATION DURING
ANTICIPATORY SMOOTH EYE MOVEMENTS |
| G. Blohm1; M.
Missal2*; P. Lefèvre1 |
| 1. CESAME and Lab. Neurophysiol.,
Universite catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium |
| 2. Smith-Kettlewell Eye Res. Inst., San
Francisco, CA, USA |
|
Expectation of future target motion
leads to anticipatory smooth eye movements that are reinforced by
repetitive and predictable visual stimuli (Kowler et al., 1984). We
investigated the influence of anticipatory smooth eye movements on
saccades in a target localization task.
Anticipatory smooth eye movements (mean 12deg/s) were obtained with
a repetitive ramp target stimulus (40deg/s, 300ms gap). In 30%
of trials, a peripheral target appeared ±15deg around the eye
position for 10ms (transient condition) or 1000ms (sustained condition)
and remained stationary. The human subjects typically made 2-3 saccades
to the target and we measured the amplitude of the first saccade and
the final eye position (after the last saccade).
Firstly, we compared the main sequence of saccades during anticipatory
smooth eye movements with control saccades and found that there is a
linear addition of saccadic and smooth motor commands. Secondly, the
amplitude of the first saccade was only correlated with position error
at the flash offset (transient condition), whereas it was correlated
with both position error and smooth eye movement velocity (or retinal
slip) in the sustained condition. Thirdly, in the transient condition,
final eye position was accurate because it accounted for the smooth eye
displacement.
We conclude that, in the transient condition, the oculomotor system
probably uses the memorized position of the target. However, the poor
precision of the first saccade indicates that the smooth movement was
not compensated for at the time that saccade was planned, but only
later during the orientation process.
Supported by: FNRS, SSTC and FSR (Belgium)
|
|
|
|
|